(With info on a common way authors scam readers)Home / Marketing Your Book / What Exactly is a Bestselling Book
>>Has anyone done it? What did you do? What was your process/approach? Or was it simply luck?
Top 100 in ALL of Amazon or Top 100 in a Genre Category? Because it's different for each.
I've never been anything close to the Top 100 of all of Amazon, but I have more than a dozen books that have reached #1 of the Top 100 in their categories at one time or another.
Here's the secret: sell 1 more book then however many books book #2 sold.
It's that simple.
A lot depends on your genre category. Amazon has more than 2,000 genre categories, which means there are 200,000 books listed as "Top 100" books....minimum.
If you are writing one of the very popular genres, like Paranormal Romance or Murder Mystery, your chances of getting even close to the top 100 is slim at best. This is because you are competing against big house publishers, like Harlequin Books ho can sell tens of thousands of copies a week. The popular genres are VERY difficult to get into the Top 100 lists of.
On the other hand, if you are writing a very obscure genre, like "Unicorn Erotica" or "Dino Porn", you'll probably be in the Top 10, let alone the Top 100, without even selling a single copy.... this is because if you look at those Top 100 lists, you'll notice 5, 10, maybe 15 titles at the most on the list. The list doesn't even have 100 books listed, because there are not 100 books published within that genre. Obscure genres have only a few titles, fewer then 100 titles published total in the genre, means if you publish in that genre, you are 100% GUARANTEED to be in the Top 100 list for that category, as soon as you publish the book, before you even make a sale.
I write in obscure genres, thus why so many of my books rank in the Top 10, but they do so mostly n categories, that have fewer than 50 books on the list to begin with.
In mid range genres, not popular, but not obscure, like "Transgender Romance" and "Vampire Yaoi" you can get in the Top 100 easily with only a few sales, because even though there are a lot of books published, not many books are sold. For example, one of my novels sat at #1 spot in "Transgender Romance" for a full year, after it sold 14 copies one week, then didn't sell another single copy again for the rest of the year.
My book had the little "bestseller" tag slapped on it's title for that entire year, which is very deceptive, because in the mind of the average Amazon browser, it implies that my book had sold millions of copies... when in fact, my book only ever sold 14 copies total!
Which means that ALL of the other 99 titles on that Top 100 list, each had sold fewer than 13 titles IN THEIR LIFETIME! And that NO book, in the category of "Transgender Romance" had EVER in the history of Amazon, sold a grand total of 15 copies in its lifetime!!!
That was a fact that I found rather disturbing, as it opened my eyes to how incredibly deceptive the term "Amazon Bestseller" really was.
In the end, it varies depending on the genre in question, some are easy to get on, some a nearly impossible to get on, most are achievable with minimal work, some require a bit more work but are still reachable.
(UPDATE: This answer was written in 2013)
This is a very good question and I am glad you asked it because, I would never have thought to write an article about it. It's not something I ever really think of, but yes I too have seen these so called "bestselling authors" and their phony "bestselling books" all over the internet of late. I especially see them bombarding the various writer's forums with spam posts saying "Buy my bestselling novel ____".
I always look at those posts and go "Really? If it's such a best seller than why are you so desperately spamming the threads begging people to buy it?"
Bestsellers, bestselling books, and bestselling authors are incredibly rare. I don't know what Amazon "officially" calls a bestseller, but it seems that anyone whose book ranks top 10 in it's keyword search results on Amazon's book search page, feels they are justified in claiming to have a bestselling book. Industry standard is a book does not get called a bestselling book until it reaches 100,000 sales.
The average Harlequin author earns $24,000 per year, writes 3 to 4 novels a year and writes 20 to 80 novels in the life of their writing career, usually at least one of which becomes a bestselling book. The novels are never longer than 120,000 words (281 pages) because Harlequin doesn't publish anything longer than that, as market research tells them that people looking to read romance and erotica want a book they can read in a single weekend and will not even consider buying, let alone reading a book of 300 or more pages. Each of these books sells for a cover price of $4.99 to $7.99 for print editions and $2.99 to $5.99 for e-editions.
Harlequin, like other big house publishers, puts books out in this manner:
Book released Month 1
Likewise Harlequin is on the high range of the sell price, with the
other publishers of romance and erotic novels selling ebooks in the .99c
to $2.99 range, and not even bothering to go to print until after the
e-book sells 50,000 copies (Harlequin is the ONLY romance/erotica
publisher who still brings out print editions before e-editions, and no
one, not even Harlequin still does hardcover editions). Harlequin puts
out 14 (or more) new titles a week, that's 728 titles a year, each title
selling no fewer than 25,000 copies and in total Harlequin averages
more than 2,000,000 books sold EACH YEAR.
I use Harlequin as an example because they publish all of this info online for anyone to access, and because I am personally more familiar with this company than most, but I could easily have given you the stats for other publishers I have worked with such as Avon or Ellora's Cave.
Anyways, you are asking about numbers, and I know a lot of folks who self publish think they are doing great if they are selling 100 to 1,000 books a year, but that there is the difference between the average self-published book and the average trad published book.
If a trad published book doesn't sell 25,000 copies within the first 3 months of sales the publisher pulls it out of print, calling it a lost cause and the publisher won't even look at another manuscript from that author.
A wimpy 25,000 sales in 3 months is so low and dismal that publishers kick authors out for it, yet many self-publishers are leaping for joy if they break past 1,000 sales the first year.
It is in comparing these types of sales
figures that you see the stark reality of what continues to push writers
to trad publish: volume of sales.
I think when you see self-published authors on Twitter calling their books a bestseller, they are typically referring to Amazon's "bestseller for it's genre/category/keyword", and all it takes to get into that is to be the one book that sells the most copies in it's genre that day.
In other words, if every book in the horror
category sells just 1 copy today, but your book sells 2 instead, than
for today at least, Amazon is going to call your book "a bestseller", because it was the bestselling book in the horror section today.
It's one thing to say you are a bestseller in an Amazon category, which means you sold anything over 1 copy more than the next guy, for one day, and could mean that if your book sold 5 copies in 1 year, but sold all 5 of those copies 1 day when everyone else that day sold 1 copy, Amazon would still call you a best seller even if your book sold 5 copies total in 3 years while the book that was #9 the same day went on to sell 10,000 copies a week later. Can you see the issue here why it's misleading when an author tells you they had the bestselling book in "___ category on Amazon on ___ day"?
There is a huge difference between saying "My book was the bestselling book in the horror section of Amazon on May 1, 2012" and saying "My book is on the bestselling books list!". If you say your book is on the bestselling book list, than it sure as hell better be otherwise you risk getting your ass sued by The New York Times, who happens to own the Official Bestsellers List.
If you really want to know if your book is a bestseller: read The New York Time's bestseller list, because they are the ones (not Amazon, your publisher, your mom, your best friend, or anyone else) who say if your book is a bestseller or not. Their criteria is the book must sell 100,000 copies within the first 6 months of publication, in order to make it on their list.
It is so incredibly rare for a book to sell 100,000 in it LIFETIME that Oprah will consider your book for a review if it sells 100,000 copies EVER, but for a book to sell 100,000 copies in fewer than 6 months, is so outstandingly rare that it only happens a few dozen times a year.
More than 50,000 new titles are released each
year and of them only about 24 of them are going to sell 100,000 copies
fast enough for NYT to say "Look at this, THIS is what a bestselling book
So, yeah, are the others on Twitter actually bestsellers or not? Well, the NYT list is always available on their website, it's posted at the front desk of every library and every bookstore check out counter, so next time you see an author on Twitter saying "I'm a bestseller" jot down their name, then head on over to NYT and see if their name is on the NYT's list or not. If they are on the list, then yes they are in fact a bona fide bestseller. If they are not on the list than they are not an OFFICIAL AUTHENTIC worldwide bestseller and are only a bestseller on Amazon's category list.
Most readers see
the words bestseller, bestselling book, or bestselling author and assume you are on the NYT list and many readers
are known to look up that list, find you not on it, than retaliate by
giving you a 1 star review while warning other readers that you are a
lying fraud who pretends to be a bestseller when you are not on the NYT
list. So you have to take this into consideration.
Ask yourself, is calling yourself a bestseller when you are not on the OFFICIAL bestseller list posted by New York Times worth the eventual and inevitable loss of reader trust you will gain once they discover you lied to them?
Don't think you'll get caught?
Remember the NYT bestseller John Locke who made a million dollars on Amazon in 2010? Look up his formerly 5 star reviews on Amazon now that it's known it was nothing but a hoax - one of his books has over 500 1-star reviews all calling him a "lying fraud" who pretended to be a bestseller when he wasn't.
And guess who ratted him out? New York Times, that's who! And not just for "bestseller fraud" but also for 5-star review fraud. Turns out John Locke pais a review writing company to write 5,000 5-star reviews, all of which where computer generated and posted on Amazon via 5,000 fake Amazon accounts. The 5,000 books supposedly sold, were in fact sold just to the one person who owned the review company and being e-books were not resold to readers. Where did Locke get the money to pull off this huge elaborate scam? He one huge amounts of money on a reality TV show and use the winnings to fund this huge "bestselling author" hoax.
In January 2013 NYT ran a huge article on John Locke and a whole list of about 50 other authors who were falsely printing "NYT Bestselling author" on the covers of their books as a marketing scam to gain sales. John Locke is lucky he didn't get 25 years in prison and only had to pay a few million in fines to NYT for infringing on their copyrighted use of the words "NYT Bestseller" and trademarked use of the phrase "bestselling author".
Oddly, by calling him out, NYT inadvertently gave him large amounts of free advertising and one of his books did get on the NYT's list later on. Weird how things work out.
I think all of us authors should let NYT's attack on John Locke be a lesson in not being so loose in calling ourselves bestsellers. Do you think NYT is going to stop with just the 50 authors they outed already? I don't. I think this is just the beginning of NYT's squashing the trend of author's claiming to be bestsellers all willy nilly. I think we are going to see a lot more of NYTs cracking down on the over use of "bestseller".
Me? I've been self pubbing since 1978 and none of my books have reached 10,000 sales yet, so I don't consider myself a bestseller. I'm a good seller maybe, but a bestseller? No. So I'm not going to try to deceive my readers by calling myself something I'm not, just to make more sales. I can't speak for other authors. I don't know what criteria they use for calling themselves bestsellers. I only know that I ain't got millions of dollars to pay NYTs trademark infringement fines with, so I ain't willing to risk it.